Advantages and Disadvantages of Die Casting

Use This Checklist Before You Commit Tooling Cash

Die casting delivers hundreds of millions of near-net-shape metal parts every year—from phone frames to EV drive-unit housings. But it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. This post weighs the hard benefits against the practical limitations so you can decide—early—whether high-pressure die casting (HPDC), gravity die casting, or sand casting will serve your technical and business goals.


Process Productivity

MetricHPDCGravity Die CastSand Cast
Cycle time (Al)20–60 s120–180 s15–30 min
Typical batch size≥ 10 0001 000–10 0001–1 000
Well-controlled scrap2–5 %2–5 %5–15 %

Advantage: A single four-cavity, 400-t HPDC cell cycling at 40 s spits out > 300 000 parts mo⁻¹.
Drawback: You only hit that cadence with robotic ladling, die-spray optimisation, and preventive maintenance—capex that low-volume programs cannot justify.


Dimensional Accuracy & Surface Finish

  • Linear tolerance (Al HPDC): ± 0.10 mm for the first 25 mm + 0.02 mm / 25 mm thereafter.

  • Surface roughness: Ra 1.6 µm (Al) to 0.8 µm (Zn).

Logos, serial numbers, and even light knurl textures survive e-coat or powder coat—saving engraving or secondary marking.

Trade-off: Ribs thinner than 1.5 mm freeze rapidly; if gate velocity, die temperature, or vacuum is off, you get misruns or cold shuts.


Mechanical Properties—Reality Check

Property (Al-Si alloy)HPDC (vacuum)Gravity Die Cast (T6)6082-T6 CNC billet
UTS (MPa)240310330
0.2 % YS (MPa)160250290
Elongation (%)4–68–1012
Fatigue limit @ 10⁷ cy (MPa)557090

Why the gap? Entrained bifilm oxides inside HPDC feed hydrogen-filled porosity. Vacuum fill, < 0.5 m s⁻¹ gate velocity, and in-cavity pressure can halve the gap, but gravity cast and wrought products still win where high-cycle fatigue rules (think suspension knuckles).


Tooling Economics & Break-Even

ToolCost (USD)Typical life (shots)
Single-cavity HPDC (400 t)60 k – 90 k80 k–120 k
Four-cavity HPDC (200 t)120 k – 160 k60 k–90 k
Gravity permanent mold12 k – 20 k150 k pours
Sand pattern + core boxes6 k – 12 kreplace yearly

Break-even vs. sand casting typically falls at 6 000–8 000 units for a palm-sized part. HPDC’s higher capex is amortised quickly on automotive or appliance volumes, but hurts in niche or aftermarket runs.


Material Flexibility & Service Limits

MetalHPDC suitabilityMax service tempNotes
Aluminum Al-SiExcellent200 °C (as-cast)Solution HT < 200 °C or blister risk
Magnesium AZGood120 °CNeed SF₆-free cover gas
Zinc Zn-AlBest detail120 °CVery low draft (< 0.25°)
Copper, BrassGravity onlyToo hot for H-13 dies

Need UTS > 350 MPa, heat > 350 °C, or hermeticity?—look at squeeze casting, forging, or CNC billet.


Design Constraints You Can’t Ignore

FeatureHPDC RuleWhy it matters
Draft≥ 0.5° outside, 1° insideDie life & ejection
Wall uniformity± 20 %Flow & solidification balance
Blind pocketsDepth ≤ 3× wall unless vented/vacuumedGas entrapment
Boss fillet≥ 0.4× wallHot spot → shrink

These constraints often conflict with industrial-design goals—loop casting engineers in before A-surface freezes.


Quality Control Overheads

  • X-ray or CT for structural parts; reject criteria < 0.3 % porosity by volume.

  • Helium leak down to 1 × 10⁻⁵ mbar L s⁻¹ for e-motor housings.

  • Die thermal mapping every 5 000 shots—copper pin sensors or thermal cameras.

These steps add $0.10–$0.70 per part—but field failures cost far more.


Sustainability & Recycling

Die casting lives inside an 80 % recycled-aluminum loop; dross and machining chips are remelted.

MetricHPDC AlInjection-molded ABS
CO₂-eq cradle-to-gate (kg kg⁻¹)8.52.4
In-service CO₂ saved (light-weighting 1 kg in auto)–25 kg lifetimeN/A

While primary Al is carbon-intense, lightweighting still pays back within months of vehicle use.


When Die Casting Is Not the Answer

  1. Annual demand < 5 000 parts—tooling never amortises.

  2. Shot weight > 15 kg—few presses can fill reliably.

  3. Post-heat-treatment above 350 °C—blistering & dimensional drift.

  4. True hermeticity for high vacuum electronics—look at wrought housings or HIP after casting.


Summary Table

AttributeAdvantageDisadvantage
ProductivitySeconds per shotNeeds automation & uptime discipline
Accuracy± 0.10 mm achievableThin ribs risk misruns
StrengthUp to 310 MPa UTS with heat-treatBifilm defects reduce fatigue
ToolingLow part cost at volume$60 k+ upfront
SustainabilityHigh recyclabilityHigher CO₂ vs. plastics
Design freedomCast-in threads, logosDraft & wall uniformity strict

Decision Flowchart

graph TD
A[Part volume > 8000/yr?] -->|No| B[Choose sand or CNC]
B --> End
A -->|Yes| C[Wall ≤ 5 mm & weight < 15 kg?]
C -->|No| D[Consider gravity permanent mold]
D --> End
C -->|Yes| E[Structural fatigue > 10⁷ cycles?]
E -->|Yes| F[Gravity + T6 or squeeze casting]
F --> End
E -->|No| G[Select HPDC with vacuum & 0.5 m s⁻¹ gate]
G --> End

Key Takeaways

  • HPDC rules high-volume metal parts under 15 kg that demand ± 0.1 mm accuracy.

  • Use vacuum + ≤ 0.5 m s⁻¹ gate velocity to close much of the property gap to gravity castings.

  • Break-even vs. sand casting sits around 6 000–8 000 pcs for hand-sized parts—check your BOM before cutting steel.

  • Where fatigue, temperature, or low volume dominate, gravity die, squeeze, or CNC billet may be better.

graph TD
A[Part volume > 8000/yr?] -->|No| B[Choose sand or CNC]
B --> End
A -->|Yes| C[Wall ≤ 5 mm & weight < 15 kg?]
C -->|No| D[Consider gravity permanent mold]
D --> End
C -->|Yes| E[Structural fatigue > 10⁷ cycles?]
E -->|Yes| F[Gravity + T6 or squeeze casting]
F --> End
E -->|No| G[Select HPDC with vacuum & 0.5 m s⁻¹ gate]
G --> End
Lexical error on line 4. Unrecognized text.
...dA -->|Yes| C[Wall ≤ 5 mm & weight < 15
----------------------^